金融公司员工EB-1A杰出人才绿卡申请批准:博士毕业转行金融,凭借电子工程与机器学习科研成果直接获批无RFE EB-1A Approval for Finance Professional: Ph.D. Graduate Transitions to Finance, Approved Without RFE Based on Electrical Engineering and Machine Learning Research
新未名律所 | EB-1A成功案例 | 电子工程·机器学习·金融行业·I-140直接获批 | New Weiming Law Group | EB-1A Success Story | Electrical Engineering, Machine Learning, Finance, I-140 Approved Without RFE
一句话核心总结(TL;DR):博士毕业后进入金融、科技等行业,并不意味着此前的科研成果失去了移民申请价值。关键在于如何准确定位申请人的专业领域,并通过充分、有说服力的证据,证明其学术成就、行业影响力以及未来在美国继续发挥专业能力的前景。本案申请人拥有美国知名大学电子工程(Electrical Engineering)博士学位,博士期间在机器学习、人工智能及相关算法研究方面取得突出科研成果,博士毕业后不久进入纽约一家知名金融公司工作。新未名律所全面分析其学术经历、研究成果和职业发展方向后,成功将其此前在电子工程、机器学习领域积累的科研成就与金融行业专业工作相结合,制定了有针对性的EB-1A申请方案。签约后数月内完成申请准备并递交I-140申请;在未使用加速审理(Premium Processing)的情况下,提交后仅六个月便直接获得批准,全程没有收到补件通知(RFE)。申请重点围绕三项法定证据标准:学术论文发表(Authorship of Scholarly Articles)、具有重大意义的原创性贡献(Original Contributions of Major Significance,通过学术引用、代表性引用分析和独立专家推荐信证明)、评审他人工作(Judging the Work of Others,通过国际知名期刊及学术会议审稿记录证明)。律所将申请人核心专业领域定位于机器学习及相关算法研究,重点突出其已获国际认可的科研贡献,并结合目前的金融研究工作说明其未来继续在美国发挥专业能力的方向,使整个申请论证完整、合理且有说服力。
TL;DR (English): Transitioning to finance, technology, or other industries after earning a Ph.D. does not mean your prior research loses value for immigration purposes. The key is accurately defining your field and presenting persuasive evidence of academic achievement, industry impact, and your plan to continue contributing professionally in the U.S. The beneficiary in this case holds a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from a well-known U.S. university, with outstanding research in machine learning, artificial intelligence, and related algorithms during graduate study, and joined a prominent New York finance firm shortly after graduation. After a comprehensive analysis of the beneficiary's academic background, research achievements, and career trajectory, New Weiming Law Group successfully connected prior research accomplishments in electrical engineering and machine learning with current professional work in finance, designing a targeted EB-1A strategy. The I-140 petition was prepared and filed within months of retention; without Premium Processing, it was approved in only six months with no Request for Evidence (RFE). The petition centered on three regulatory criteria: Authorship of Scholarly Articles, Original Contributions of Major Significance (demonstrated through citations, citation analysis, and independent expert letters), and Judging the Work of Others (documented through peer review for leading international journals and conferences). The firm framed the beneficiary's core expertise as machine learning and related algorithms, highlighted internationally recognized research contributions, and connected them to ongoing financial research, creating a coherent, well-supported, and persuasive petition.
本文介绍新未名律所(New Weiming Law Group)EB-1A杰出人才移民申请成功案例。申请人是一位博士毕业不久的年轻科研人才,目前在纽约一家知名金融公司工作。虽然申请人已经从高校科研环境转入金融行业,但新未名律所在全面分析其学术经历、研究成果和职业发展方向后,成功将其此前在电子工程、机器学习领域积累的科研成就与金融行业的专业工作相结合,制定了有针对性的EB-1A申请方案。在签约后的几个月内,新未名律所完成了全面的申请准备并递交I-140申请;在没有使用加速审理(Premium Processing)的情况下,申请提交后仅六个月便直接获得批准,全程没有收到补件通知(RFE)。本所立足美国首都华盛顿地区,长期为大华府DMV地区、马里兰(Maryland)、弗吉尼亚(Virginia)及全美的华人、留学生、博士后及高科技/科研人员办理EB-1A、NIW国家利益豁免、EB-2/3 PERM、H-1B、O-1及I-140/I-485申请。
This article presents a successful EB-1A (extraordinary ability) case handled by New Weiming Law Group. The beneficiary is a young researcher who recently earned a Ph.D. and now works at a prominent finance firm in New York. Although the beneficiary had moved from an academic research environment to the finance industry, New Weiming Law Group conducted a comprehensive analysis of the beneficiary's academic background, research achievements, and career development, successfully connecting prior accomplishments in electrical engineering and machine learning with current professional work in finance to design a targeted EB-1A strategy. Within months of retention, the firm completed petition preparation and filed the I-140; without Premium Processing, the petition was approved in only six months with no Request for Evidence (RFE). The firm is based in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and represents Chinese nationals, international students, postdocs, and STEM professionals in the DMV region, Maryland, Virginia, and nationwide in EB-1A, NIW, EB-2/3 PERM, H-1B, O-1, and I-140/I-485 matters.
1. 申请人背景:电子工程博士毕业,进入纽约金融行业
Beneficiary Background: Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering, Transitioned to Finance in New York
本案申请人拥有美国知名大学电子工程(Electrical Engineering)博士学位。博士期间,他在机器学习、人工智能及相关算法研究方面取得了突出的科研成果,尤其专注于统计模型与算法优化等方向。博士毕业后不久,申请人进入纽约一家知名金融公司工作,将机器学习、统计分析及算法研究方面的专业知识应用于金融领域。与长期留在高校或研究机构的科研人员不同,申请人的职业发展已经转向金融行业。因此,如何将此前在电子工程领域取得的科研成果与目前的工作合理衔接,成为此次EB-1A申请需要重点解决的问题。新未名律所在评估后认为,虽然申请人的工作环境发生了变化,但其核心专业能力仍然具有明确的延续性。现代金融研究高度依赖数学建模、统计学习、大规模数据处理和机器学习算法,申请人在博士期间开展的优化算法和统计研究与这些技术方向有着密切联系。因此,申请人从电子工程科研领域进入金融行业,并非完全脱离原有专业,而是在新的产业环境中继续运用和发展其核心技术能力。
The beneficiary holds a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from a well-known U.S. university. During graduate study, he achieved outstanding research results in machine learning, artificial intelligence, and related algorithms, focusing on statistical models and algorithm optimization. Shortly after graduation, he joined a prominent finance firm in New York, applying his expertise in machine learning, statistical analysis, and algorithmic research to the financial sector. Unlike researchers who remain in academia or research institutions, the beneficiary's career had shifted to the finance industry. How to connect prior research achievements in electrical engineering with current work became a central challenge for the EB-1A petition. New Weiming Law Group concluded after evaluation that, although the work environment had changed, the beneficiary's core professional competencies showed clear continuity. Modern financial research relies heavily on mathematical modeling, statistical learning, large-scale data processing, and machine learning algorithms—all closely related to the optimization and statistical research the beneficiary conducted during the Ph.D. Therefore, the move from electrical engineering research to finance was not a departure from the original field but a continuation and development of core technical abilities in a new industrial context.
2. 申请优势:学术论文和国际引用
Key Strengths: Academic Publications and International Citations
本案申请人的突出优势在于博士毕业时已经积累了具有相当国际影响力的学术成果。申请人在电子工程和机器学习相关领域发表了高质量学术论文,其中多篇发表于国际知名期刊及机器学习领域的重要学术会议。这些论文涵盖了多个重要研究方向,体现了申请人较为扎实的学术基础和持续的科研创新能力。在递交申请时,申请人的研究论文已经获得了多次学术引用,引用者来自全球几十个国家和地区的科研机构,研究成果受到国际知名科研机构学者的关注,并被后续研究引用、讨论和借鉴。这些客观证据不仅反映了申请人的论文发表能力,也表明他的研究成果已经产生了超出个人研究团队范围的学术影响。在准备申请材料时,新未名律所不仅整理了论文数量、发表期刊和引用数据,还对具有代表性的引用文献进行了深入分析,重点展示其他科研人员如何参考、使用和发展申请人的研究成果。对于EB-1A申请而言,论文和引用数量固然重要,但更有说服力的是证明这些成果为什么重要,以及它们对相关研究领域产生了怎样的实际影响。
A key strength was the beneficiary's internationally influential academic record at the time of Ph.D. graduation. The beneficiary published high-quality research papers in electrical engineering and machine learning, including multiple papers in leading international journals and major machine learning conferences. These publications covered several important research directions, demonstrating a solid academic foundation and sustained capacity for scientific innovation. By the time of filing, the research papers had been cited numerous times by researchers from dozens of countries and regions worldwide, showing that the work had attracted attention from scholars at internationally recognized institutions and had been referenced, discussed, and built upon in subsequent research. This objective evidence reflected not only the beneficiary's publication record but also the scholarly impact of the research beyond the immediate research team. In preparing the petition, New Weiming Law Group not only compiled publication counts, journal names, and citation data but also conducted in-depth analysis of representative citing works, highlighting how other researchers had referenced, used, and advanced the beneficiary's findings. For EB-1A petitions, publication and citation counts are important, but more persuasive is demonstrating why the contributions matter and what concrete impact they have had on the field.
3. 突出原创性科研贡献,证明申请人的国际学术影响力
Highlighting Original Research Contributions and International Scholarly Impact
本案申请人的科研工作涉及多个机器学习研究方向,能够减少机器学习模型训练所需的人工标注数据量,在保持较高模型性能的同时提高训练效率。申请人参与开发的算法致力于解决训练数据存在噪声或者异常值时的模型学习问题,并提供相应的理论分析。此外,申请人还取得了其他具有原创性的研究成果,为复杂数据环境下的统计估计和算法优化提供了新的解决思路。这些研究不仅具有理论意义,也与金融预测、风险分析、大规模数据建模等实际应用场景具有技术关联。新未名律所在申请中重点梳理了上述科研成果的原创性、学术影响和应用价值,并结合国际学者对其研究工作的引用及评价,证明申请人已经在相关专业领域作出了具有重要意义的原创性贡献(Original Contributions of Major Significance)。同时,律所还通过多位具有国际学术影响力的专家出具的独立推荐信,进一步说明申请人研究成果的价值。这些推荐信不仅肯定了申请人的科研能力,还结合具体研究内容,对其原创算法、理论贡献以及后续学术影响进行了专业分析。通过客观引用证据与专家意见相互印证,申请材料形成了较为完整的证据体系。
The beneficiary's research spanned multiple machine learning directions, reducing the amount of manually labeled data required for model training while maintaining high performance and improving training efficiency. The algorithms the beneficiary helped develop addressed model learning problems when training data contained noise or outliers, and provided corresponding theoretical analysis. Additionally, the beneficiary made other original contributions, offering new approaches to statistical estimation and algorithm optimization in complex data environments. These contributions have theoretical significance and also connect technically to real-world applications such as financial forecasting, risk analysis, and large-scale data modeling. New Weiming Law Group systematically highlighted the originality, scholarly impact, and practical value of these contributions, and combined them with international scholars' citations and evaluations to demonstrate that the beneficiary had made Original Contributions of Major Significance in the relevant professional field. The firm also obtained independent recommendation letters from multiple experts with international scholarly influence, further explaining the value of the beneficiary's research. These letters not only affirmed the beneficiary's research capabilities but also provided professional analysis of the original algorithms, theoretical contributions, and subsequent scholarly impact, tying objective citation evidence together with expert opinion to form a complete evidentiary framework.
4. 国际顶级期刊及会议审稿经历,进一步证明专业认可度
Peer Review for Leading Journals and Conferences, Further Demonstrating Professional Recognition
除了论文发表和科研贡献外,本案申请人还拥有较为丰富的国际期刊及学术会议审稿经历。申请人曾受邀为多个具有国际影响力的学术期刊和会议评审其他研究人员的论文,这通常需要具备与论文主题相关的专业知识和科研判断能力。新未名律所在申请中对这些审稿经历进行了系统整理,并结合相关期刊、会议的学术地位,证明申请人的专业能力已经获得同行认可。因此,本案申请重点围绕EB-1A的三项法定证据标准展开:
Beyond publications and research contributions, the beneficiary also had substantial peer review experience for international journals and conferences. The beneficiary was invited to review papers for multiple internationally influential journals and conferences, a role that typically requires specialized knowledge and scientific judgment related to the paper topics. New Weiming Law Group systematically documented this peer review experience and, combined with the academic standing of the relevant journals and conferences, demonstrated that the beneficiary's professional competence had been recognized by peers. The petition centered on three regulatory EB-1A evidence criteria:
- 学术论文发表(Authorship of Scholarly Articles):通过高质量学术论文,展示申请人在专业领域的持续科研成果。
Authorship of Scholarly Articles: high-quality publications demonstrating sustained research output in the field. - 具有重大意义的原创性贡献(Original Contributions of Major Significance):通过学术引用、代表性引用分析和独立专家推荐信,证明其研究成果的重要影响。
Original Contributions of Major Significance: demonstrated through citations, citation analysis, and independent expert letters showing the impact of the research. - 评审他人工作(Judging the Work of Others):通过国际知名期刊及学术会议的审稿记录,证明申请人曾受邀评价同行科研成果。
Judging the Work of Others: documented through peer review for leading international journals and conferences, showing the beneficiary was invited to evaluate the work of peers.
新未名律所将三方面证据有机结合,既逐项回应EB-1A的相关要求,也从整体上论证申请人的科研成就与国际专业认可度。
New Weiming Law Group integrated the three categories of evidence, responding to each EB-1A requirement while also demonstrating the beneficiary's research achievements and international professional recognition as a whole.
5. 申请策略:将电子工程科研背景与金融行业工作有效衔接
Petition Strategy: Effectively Connecting Electrical Engineering Research with Finance Career
本案一个值得关注的特点是:申请人在提出EB-1A申请时,已经不再从事传统意义上的高校科研工作,而是在金融公司。对于类似背景的申请人,容易产生一个疑问:"我博士期间的研究主要集中在电子工程、计算机科学或机器学习领域,现在已经进入金融行业工作,还能利用以前的科研成果申请EB-1A吗?"本案给出了一个值得参考的成功实例。新未名律所在评估过程中,并未简单地以申请人目前所在的金融行业重新定义其全部专业成就,而是深入分析其博士研究方向与目前工作内容之间的技术关联。申请人在电子工程领域所积累的大规模机器学习、算法及统计分析能力,正是现代金融研究可以运用的重要技术基础,尤其是在处理复杂数据、构建预测模型以及提高算法可靠性等方面,其此前的科研成果具有明确的专业延续性。基于这一特点,新未名律所将申请人的核心专业领域定位于机器学习及相关算法研究,重点突出其已经获得国际认可的科研贡献,并结合目前的金融研究工作说明其未来继续在美国发挥专业能力的方向。这种申请策略既充分利用了申请人已有的学术成就,又避免了科研背景与当前工作之间出现明显脱节,使整个申请论证更加完整、合理和具有说服力。
A notable feature of this case is that, at the time of filing the EB-1A petition, the beneficiary was no longer engaged in traditional academic research but was working at a finance firm. Applicants with similar backgrounds often ask: "My Ph.D. research was in electrical engineering, computer science, or machine learning, and now I work in finance—can I still use my prior research for an EB-1A petition?" This case offers an instructive success story. New Weiming Law Group did not simply redefine all of the beneficiary's professional accomplishments based on the current finance role; instead, the firm analyzed in depth the technical connections between the Ph.D. research and current work. The large-scale machine learning, algorithmic, and statistical analysis capabilities the beneficiary developed in electrical engineering are fundamental technical tools in modern financial research, especially for handling complex data, building predictive models, and improving algorithmic reliability—areas where the prior research had clear professional continuity. Based on this, New Weiming Law Group framed the beneficiary's core field as machine learning and related algorithms, highlighted the internationally recognized research contributions, and connected them to ongoing financial research to show the direction in which the beneficiary will continue to contribute professionally in the U.S. This strategy fully leveraged existing academic achievements while avoiding any disconnect between the research background and current work, making the entire petition coherent, well-reasoned, and persuasive.
6. 签约后数月完成申请准备,未经加速审理、无RFE直接获批
Petition Prepared Within Months of Retention, Approved Without Premium Processing or RFE
在确定申请策略后,新未名律所团队对申请人的科研成果进行了全面梳理,系统准备了论文发表记录、引用分析、代表性研究成果、专家推荐信、审稿经历及相关辅助证据。针对申请人的职业背景,律所还专门加强了科研成就与当前金融行业工作之间的关联论证,使申请材料能够清晰展示其专业发展路径。经过数月的细致准备,新未名律所完成了完整的EB-1A申请材料,并正式向美国移民局递交I-140申请。值得一提的是,本案并未申请Premium Processing加速审理,而是按照正常审理程序等待移民局决定。最终,申请人在提交申请后仅六个月便获得EB-1A批准,且审理过程中没有收到任何补件通知(Request for Evidence, RFE)。这一结果体现了本案申请材料的完整性及法律论证的针对性,也再次证明了准确挖掘和组织申请人已有成就的重要性。
After determining the petition strategy, the New Weiming Law Group team comprehensively reviewed the beneficiary's research achievements and systematically prepared publication records, citation analyses, representative research contributions, expert recommendation letters, peer review documentation, and supporting evidence. Given the beneficiary's career background, the firm also strengthened the argument connecting research achievements with current work in finance, ensuring the petition materials clearly showed the professional development trajectory. After months of careful preparation, New Weiming Law Group completed the full EB-1A petition and filed the I-140 with USCIS. Notably, the case did not use Premium Processing but followed the standard adjudication timeline. Ultimately, the petition was approved just six months after filing, with no Request for Evidence (RFE) issued during adjudication. This outcome reflects both the completeness of the petition materials and the precision of the legal arguments, and once again demonstrates the importance of accurately identifying and organizing an applicant's existing achievements.
7. 新未名律所:科研转行业,仍有机会申请EB-1A杰出人才绿卡
New Weiming Law Group: Transitioning from Research to Industry Does Not Preclude EB-1A
对于拥有博士学位、科研论文及专业技术背景的申请人而言,EB-1A杰出人才移民是一条值得认真评估的职业移民途径。尤其是近年来,不少电子工程、计算机科学、人工智能、数学及统计学专业的博士毕业生,在完成学业后选择进入金融、科技、咨询或其他行业。虽然工作岗位发生变化,但他们在博士阶段形成的科研成果、技术专长和国际学术影响力,并不会因为离开高校而自动失去价值。能否成功申请EB-1A,需要结合个人具体情况,分析已有科研证据是否满足相关法律标准,以及申请人是否能够证明自己将在美国继续从事专业领域内的工作。本案中,申请人博士毕业不久,已经进入纽约金融行业;新未名律所通过深入挖掘其在电子工程和机器学习领域的科研积累,将学术成果与金融研究职业发展有机结合,最终帮助其在没有加速审理、没有RFE补件的情况下,顺利获得EB-1A批准。新未名律所始终注重从申请人的实际背景出发,充分挖掘科研成果的价值,制定具有针对性的移民申请方案。无论您目前仍在高校或研究机构从事科研工作,还是已经进入金融、科技等行业,只要具备较强的专业成就和相应的证明材料,都可以考虑对EB-1A申请资格进行专业评估。
For applicants with a Ph.D., research publications, and technical expertise, EB-1A is a career-based immigration path worth serious evaluation. In recent years, many Ph.D. graduates in electrical engineering, computer science, artificial intelligence, mathematics, and statistics have moved into finance, technology, consulting, or other industries after completing their degrees. Although their job titles have changed, the research achievements, technical expertise, and international scholarly influence they developed during graduate study do not automatically lose value when they leave academia. Whether an EB-1A petition will succeed depends on individual circumstances, analyzing whether existing research evidence meets the relevant legal standards and whether the applicant can demonstrate a plan to continue working in the professional field in the U.S. In this case, the beneficiary had recently graduated with a Ph.D. and entered the New York finance industry; New Weiming Law Group thoroughly mined the beneficiary's research record in electrical engineering and machine learning, connected academic achievements with career development in financial research, and ultimately helped secure EB-1A approval without Premium Processing or RFE. New Weiming Law Group consistently begins with the applicant's actual background, fully develops the value of research achievements, and designs targeted immigration strategies. Whether you are still conducting research in academia or have transitioned to finance, technology, or another industry, if you have strong professional accomplishments and supporting documentation, you should consider a professional EB-1A eligibility evaluation.
💡 博士毕业后转入金融、科技等行业,此前科研成果仍可能用于EB-1A申请。关键在于如何准确定位专业领域,并通过充分、有说服力的证据证明学术成就和国际影响力。
Transitioning to finance, tech, or another industry after a Ph.D. does not preclude using prior research for an EB-1A petition. The key is accurately defining your field and presenting persuasive evidence of academic achievement and international impact.
作为靠谱华人移民律师团队,新未名律所(New Weiming Law Group)致力于为广大科研人员、博士毕业生及各行业专业人才提供职业移民法律服务,帮助申请人充分展示专业成就,把握美国职业发展的机遇。无论您目前从事高校科研、在金融科技行业工作,还是在其他领域发展,只要具备较强的专业成就,欢迎联系我们获取免费评估(Free Evaluation),了解EB-1A、NIW国家利益豁免、EB-2/3 PERM、H-1B、O-1或其他移民类别的可行性。新未名律所在美国首都华盛顿地区、大华府DMV地区、马里兰(Maryland)和弗吉尼亚(Virginia)为华人、留学生、博士后及高科技/科研人员提供全方位移民法律服务。欢迎访问新未名律所官方网站:www.nwmlaw.com。
As experienced, reliable immigration attorneys, New Weiming Law Group is dedicated to providing employment-based immigration legal services for researchers, Ph.D. graduates, and professionals across industries, helping applicants fully showcase their professional accomplishments and seize career opportunities in the U.S. Whether you are conducting research in academia, working in finance or technology, or developing in another field, if you have strong professional achievements, contact us for a Free Evaluation to explore the feasibility of EB-1A, NIW, EB-2/3 PERM, H-1B, O-1, or other immigration categories. New Weiming Law Group serves the Washington D.C. metropolitan area, the DMV region, Maryland, and Virginia, providing comprehensive immigration legal services for Chinese nationals, international students, postdocs, and STEM professionals. Visit us at www.nwmlaw.com.
关于新未名律所 / About New Weiming Law Group
新未名律所(New Weiming Law Group)成立于2009年,立足美国首都华盛顿地区,服务大华府DMV地区、马里兰(Maryland)和弗吉尼亚(Virginia)及全美的华人、留学生、博士后及高科技/科研人员。
Founded in 2009, New Weiming Law Group is based in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and serves Chinese nationals, international students, postdocs, and STEM professionals in the DMV region, Maryland, Virginia, and nationwide.
律所精英合伙人团队均拥有美国顶级法学院法学博士(J.D.)学位,及名校理工科博士(Ph.D.)学位和多年科研经验。结合体系内美国移民律师协会(AILA)成员的专业视野与超过17年的风控博弈及一线护航经历,提供免费评估 Free Evaluation。
Our partners hold J.D. degrees from leading U.S. law schools as well as Ph.D. degrees in STEM fields from top universities, with years of research experience. Combining the professional perspective of AILA members with more than 17 years of front-line risk management and case advocacy, we provide a Free Evaluation.
官网 / Website:www.nwmlaw.com
邮箱 / Email:info@nwmlaw.com
关于"新未名"名称及机构关系的澄清说明
美国新未名律师事务所(New Weiming Law Group, PLLC)系在美国依法设立并执业的律师事务所,从2009年创立至今,已经帮助上万申请人取得了美国绿卡、签证和各类移民申请批准。本所在中国大陆没有设立任何分所、分支机构、办事处、代表处或其他经营机构。
对于在中国境内注册或者经营、名称中含有"新未名"字样的出国服务、移民服务、留学服务、中介、咨询或其他机构,本所特此说明:这些机构不是美国新未名律师事务所的中国分所、分支机构或办事处,与本所不存在隶属、控股、加盟、合伙、共同经营或授权代理关系。
如有任何个人或机构声称其为美国新未名律师事务所在中国的分所、办公室、代表处、独家代理或授权机构,请直接发信向美国新未名律师事务所核实。
核实邮箱 / Verification Email:info@nwmlaw.com
美国新未名律师事务所
New Weiming Law Group, PLLC
Clarification Regarding the "New Weiming" Name and Institutional Relationships (English Translation)
New Weiming Law Group, PLLC is a law firm lawfully established and practicing in the United States. Since its founding in 2009, it has helped tens of thousands of applicants obtain approvals for U.S. green cards, visas, and other immigration applications. The firm has not established any branch office, subsidiary, office, representative office, or other business establishment in mainland China.
With respect to overseas services, immigration services, study-abroad services, agencies, consultancies, or other organizations registered or operating in China whose names contain the words "新未名" (New Weiming), the firm hereby states: these organizations are not branches, subsidiaries, or offices of New Weiming Law Group in China, and have no affiliation, controlling interest, franchise, partnership, joint operation, or authorized agency relationship with the firm.
If any individual or organization claims to be a branch, office, representative office, exclusive agent, or authorized entity of New Weiming Law Group in China, please verify directly with New Weiming Law Group by email.
New Weiming Law Group, PLLC
免责声明:本文仅供一般法律信息参考,不构成针对具体个案的法律意见,阅读本文不构成律师与客户关系。本文根据实际申请案例整理,已隐去申请人个人身份及雇主信息。个案结果不构成对其他申请结果或审理时间的保证。EB-1A的审查标准、USCIS审理及加速审理时限、政府收费可能随法规和政策变化,所有申请均以USCIS的正式决定为准。
Disclaimer: This article is for general legal information only and is not legal advice for any specific case; reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. This article is based on an actual case but with the beneficiary's identity and employer information redacted. Individual case results do not guarantee outcomes or processing times for other applications. EB-1A standards, USCIS processing and premium processing timeframes, and government fees may change with regulations and policy, and all matters are governed by USCIS's official decisions.