美国绿卡变成不靠谱的欧洲永居？排期加快了，绿卡却可能等几年后被拒 Is the U.S. Green Card Becoming an Unreliable "European-Style" Residence? Faster Visa Bulletin, but I-485 Denials May Come Years Later
新未名律所 ｜ 2026年10月 ｜ New Weiming Law Group | October 2026
一句话核心总结（TL;DR）：美国绿卡排期近期明显加快（2026年10月排期表中，中国大陆出生申请人EB-1、EB-2、EB-3表B分别前进到2024年7月、2023年1月和2024年4月，F2A表B为Current），但排期前进不代表审查放松，也不代表已提交I-485的人一定能拿到绿卡。排期加快的部分原因，可能是审查趋严导致实际批准和签发数量下降。依据表B提前递交的I-485可能Pending多年，最终审查时移民局可能重新核对多年前的表格、签证记录、组织成员身份、工作经历和证据，几年前的填表错误或未披露的历史情况，可能在最后阶段导致RFE、NOID甚至拒绝；若申请人已放弃H-1B等独立身份，被拒后可能进退两难。无论EB-1A、NIW、PERM、EB-5还是亲属移民，都应从第一天起按照几年后最终审查的标准准备。
TL;DR (English): U.S. green card priority dates have advanced noticeably (in the October 2026 Visa Bulletin, Dates for Filing for China-born EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3 moved to July 2024, January 2023, and April 2024, and F2A Dates for Filing is Current), but faster movement does not mean looser review, nor that a pending I-485 will be approved. Part of the movement may reflect stricter vetting and fewer approvals and visa issuances. An I-485 filed early under Dates for Filing may stay pending for years; at final review, USCIS may re-examine old forms, visa records, organizational memberships, employment history, and evidence. A form error or undisclosed history from years ago can trigger an RFE, NOID, or denial at the last stage, and an applicant who has abandoned independent H-1B or other status may be left with no fallback. Whether EB-1A, NIW, PERM, EB-5, or family-based, prepare from day one to the standard of the final adjudication years later.
新未名律所立足美国首都华盛顿地区，长期为大华府DMV地区、马里兰(Maryland)、弗吉尼亚(Virginia)及全美的华人、留学生、博士后及高科技/科研人员办理EB-1A、NIW国家利益豁免、PERM、EB-5、亲属移民及I-140/I-485等申请。美国绿卡排期最近明显加快，这本是好消息。但作为靠谱华人移民律师团队，我们要提醒大家这个好消息背后很多人没有注意到的问题：排期可能越来越快，但绿卡申请不一定越来越容易批准。有些申请人可能在提交I-485以后等了几年，最后才发现自己的绿卡申请被拒。
New Weiming Law Group is based in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and represents Chinese nationals, international students, postdocs, and STEM professionals in the DMV region, Maryland, Virginia, and nationwide in EB-1A, NIW, PERM, EB-5, family-based immigration, and I-140/I-485 filings. Green card priority dates have advanced noticeably, which is good news. But as experienced, reliable immigration attorneys, we want to flag a problem many people overlook: the Visa Bulletin may move faster, yet approvals are not necessarily getting easier. Some applicants may wait years after filing an I-485, only to find their green card denied.
1. 绿卡排期加快，潜台词是什么？
What Does Faster Visa Bulletin Movement Really Signal?
美国亲属优先移民和职业移民的年度绿卡名额有法定数量限制。符合条件的申请人越多，等待越长；反过来，如果实际能够获批的人数减少，排期就可能加快。美国国务院在2026年9月的Visa Bulletin中明确提到，受国家安全、公共安全及其他移民政策措施影响，部分国家申请人的移民签证签发数量下降，为使当年名额得到使用，政府推进了多个类别的排期。这说明排期前进不一定是因为名额增加，也可能与实际批准、签发数量下降有关。我们判断，在审查趋严的情况下，部分类别排期仍可能继续前进，但这只是趋势判断，不是保证，排期今后也可能倒退。如果其他人被拒让排期提前，你可能受益；但如果被拒的是你自己，排期再快也没有用。
Annual family-preference and employment-based green card numbers are capped by statute. More eligible applicants means longer waits; fewer actual approvals can mean faster movement. In the September 2026 Visa Bulletin, the State Department noted that immigrant visa issuances to applicants from certain countries had declined due to national security, public safety, and other policy measures, and that it advanced several categories so annual numbers would be used. In other words, forward movement does not necessarily mean more visas; it may reflect fewer approvals and issuances. We expect some categories may keep advancing under stricter vetting, but this is a trend assessment, not a guarantee, and retrogression remains possible. If others' denials move the line forward, you may benefit; if the denial is yours, faster dates do not help.
| 类别 / Category（中国大陆出生） | 2026年10月 表B / Dates for Filing |
|---|---|
| EB-1 | 2024年7月 / July 2024 |
| EB-2 | 2023年1月 / January 2023 |
| EB-3 | 2024年4月 / April 2024 |
| F2A（绿卡持有人的配偶及未成年子女） | Current（无表B排期限制） |
💡 现在办绿卡要同时关注两个问题：第一，什么时候可以提交申请？第二，提交以后，能不能最终获得批准？过去很多人主要关注第一个问题，现在必须更加重视第二个问题。
Two questions now matter equally: When can I file? And once filed, will I actually be approved? Many people used to focus only on the first; the second now deserves far more attention.
2. 表B排到了，是否代表I-485马上批准？
Does a Current Dates for Filing Mean Your I-485 Will Be Approved Soon?
不是。绿卡排期有两个表：表A（Final Action Dates，最终裁定日期）决定何时可以使用移民签证名额并获得最终批准；表B（Dates for Filing，申请递交日期）允许符合规定的申请人提前递交材料，在美国境内调整身份的申请人还需USCIS宣布当月可用表B。表B排到不等于表A排到，可以提交I-485不等于可以批准I-485。例如，某申请人的优先日（Priority Date）是2023年1月，表B前进到2023年6月且USCIS允许使用表B，他可以提交I-485；但如果表A仍停在2022年，移民局通常不能作出最终批准，只能继续等待。表A和表B有时相差几个月，有时一年甚至更久，期间还可能倒退。即使表A排到，背景调查、面试、补件也可能继续延长时间。等待越久，申请人的身份、工作和家庭情况就越可能发生变化。
No. The Visa Bulletin has two charts: Chart A (Final Action Dates) governs when a visa number is available for final approval; Chart B (Dates for Filing) lets eligible applicants file early, and adjustment applicants inside the U.S. may use it only when USCIS announces so for that month. A current Chart B does not mean Chart A is current; being able to file an I-485 does not mean it can be approved. For example, an applicant with a January 2023 priority date can file when Chart B reaches June 2023 and USCIS allows its use; but if Chart A is still in 2022, USCIS generally cannot grant final approval, and the applicant keeps waiting. The gap between the charts can be months or more than a year, and dates can retrogress. Even after Chart A is current, background checks, interviews, and RFEs can add time. The longer the wait, the more likely the applicant's status, job, and family situation will change.
3. I-485提交后等几年，为什么可能最后才被拒？
Why Might an I-485 Be Denied Only After Years of Waiting?
I-485已经Pending，不代表移民局已确认你符合永久居民的全部条件。尤其是依据表B提前提交的I-485，可能很久之后才真正进入最终审核。届时移民局可能重新检查几年前的表格、要求新文件、重新核实个人历史、安排面试，或提出以前未充分调查的问题。几年前看似不起眼的错误，到最后可能变成严重问题。常见风险包括以下四类：
A pending I-485 does not mean USCIS has confirmed every eligibility requirement. An I-485 filed early under Chart B may reach final review only much later. At that point USCIS may re-examine forms filed years earlier, request new documents, re-verify personal history, schedule an interview, or raise issues never fully explored. A seemingly minor mistake from years ago can become serious. Common risks fall into four groups:
⚠️ 最终审查阶段的四类常见风险 / Four Common Risks at Final Review
- ① 表格填写错误或遗漏：I-485长达二十多页，有些问题问现在，有些问"是否曾经"。过去加入过某个组织、现在已退出，如果表格问的是"曾经"，就不能简单回答No。几年后移民官若发现回答与以往签证申请、移民记录或简历不一致，被认定对重要事实不实陈述的后果，可能远超普通补件。
Form errors or omissions: The I-485 runs over twenty pages; some questions ask about the present, others ask "have you ever." If you once belonged to an organization but have since left, a question asking "ever" cannot simply be answered No. If answers later conflict with prior visa applications, immigration records, or résumés, a finding of material misrepresentation can carry consequences far beyond an ordinary RFE. - ② 应披露的历史未及时、完整、准确披露：曾在政府部门、事业单位、国企、军队、警察系统工作，具有某些组织成员身份或接受过特殊培训，并不意味着一定不能拿绿卡，但需按问题实际范围如实回答并在必要时说明。违法犯罪记录、被捕或起诉、签证拒签、未经许可工作、身份中断等也需认真审查。美国政府可以综合比对多年来的申请表、面试记录和公开信息。遗漏与故意欺诈在法律上不同，但不完整的信息同样可能引发补件、延误或其他不利后果。
Incomplete disclosure of history: Past work in government, public institutions, state-owned enterprises, the military, or police, certain memberships, or special training do not automatically bar a green card, but must be disclosed accurately within each question's scope, with explanation where needed. Criminal records, arrests, visa refusals, unauthorized employment, and status gaps also need careful review. The government can compare years of applications, interview records, and public information. Omission and willful fraud are legally distinct, but incomplete information can still cause RFEs, delays, or other adverse results. - ③ 证据不充分或不符合当前审理要求：涉及不可入境性、历史身份或工作经历的问题，一份简单的个人Statement往往不够，移民局可能要求具体事实陈述和客观证据。多年前在中国发生的事情，原单位可能已搬迁、合并或注销，经办人员可能离职，文件越来越难取得。
Insufficient evidence: For inadmissibility, historical status, or employment questions, a brief personal statement is often not enough; USCIS may require detailed facts and objective evidence. For events years ago in China, the original employer may have relocated, merged, or closed, and staff may have left, making documents harder to obtain. - ④ 等待期间发生影响资格的变化：换工作、失业、创业、结婚、离婚、孩子长大、原签证到期等，都需分析对具体类别的影响。PERM职业移民换工作涉及原职位、AC21职业转换规则及Supplement J；EB-1A和NIW虽不受特定雇主约束，继续从事相关领域或拟议事业的意图仍可能需要证明；亲属移民涉及婚姻、家庭关系和经济担保；EB-5涉及项目、资金来源、资金维持和就业创造。I-485期间的EAD和合法停留，不等于独立的非移民身份。
Changes during the wait: Job changes, unemployment, starting a business, marriage, divorce, children aging, or visa expiration must be analyzed for their effect on the category. PERM job changes implicate the original position, AC21 portability, and Supplement J; EB-1A and NIW are not tied to a specific employer, but intent to continue in the field or proposed endeavor may still need proof; family cases involve the marriage, relationship, and affidavit of support; EB-5 involves the project, source of funds, sustainment, and job creation. An EAD and authorized stay based on a pending I-485 are not an independent nonimmigrant status.
4. I-140、I-130或EB-5前期获批，绿卡就稳了吗？
If Your I-140, I-130, or EB-5 Petition Is Approved, Is the Green Card Secure?
不一定。前期批准与最后的永久居民身份批准，是不同的法律审查步骤。I-140批准主要解决职业移民类别资格；I-130批准主要确认家庭关系符合要求；EB-5相关申请批准只对应投资移民程序中的特定阶段，之后移民局仍可能审查资金来源及持续合规。这些批准是申请绿卡的重要基础，但不自动证明申请人符合全部I-485或移民签证条件。最后阶段，美国政府仍会审查是否存在不可入境性、是否符合身份调整要求、证据是否充分、申请基础是否仍然有效；境外移民签证由领事官员依法独立判断。所以，无论是雇主支持的PERM、自主申请的EB-1A和NIW国家利益豁免，还是亲属移民或EB-5，都不能把前期批准当成永久居民身份的保证，等待越久，这一风险越值得重视。
Not necessarily. Earlier approvals and final permanent residence are separate legal reviews. An I-140 approval addresses eligibility for the employment category; an I-130 approval confirms the qualifying family relationship; an EB-5 approval covers only one stage of the investor process, and USCIS may later review source of funds and continued compliance. These approvals are the foundation for a green card, but they do not establish eligibility for the I-485 or immigrant visa. At the final stage, the government still reviews inadmissibility, adjustment eligibility, sufficiency of evidence, and whether the underlying basis remains valid; consular officers decide immigrant visas independently. Whether PERM, self-petitioned EB-1A or NIW, family-based, or EB-5, an earlier approval is not a guarantee of permanent residence, and the risk grows the longer you wait.
5. 为什么说美国绿卡越来越像"不靠谱的欧洲永居"？
Why Compare the U.S. Green Card Process to "Unreliable" European Residence?
过去，美国绿卡的突出优势是一旦批准，通常就是永久居民身份，不需要像某些临时居留许可那样定期重新证明原来的工作、学习或投资资格。绿卡卡片有有效期，但卡片到期和身份终止是两回事。欧洲则没有统一的移民制度：在一些国家，外国人需要先持临时居留许可合法居住达到规定年限，再申请长期或永久居留。例如，欧盟长期居民制度一般要求连续合法居住五年，并满足收入、医疗保险等条件；英国也有从临时许可逐步走向ILR（Indefinite Leave to Remain）的途径。共同特点是：最初获得长期居住和工作的机会，不等于已获得最终、稳定的永久身份。需要说明，欧洲已正式取得的永居同样受法律保护，这里比较的是走向永居过程中的不确定性。
Historically, a key advantage of the U.S. green card was that, once approved, it generally meant permanent residence, without periodically re-proving the original work, study, or investment basis as some temporary permits require. The physical card expires, but card expiration and loss of status are different things. Europe has no single immigration system: in some countries, foreigners first hold temporary permits and must reside lawfully for a set period before applying for long-term or permanent residence. The EU long-term resident framework generally requires five years of continuous lawful residence plus income, health insurance, and other conditions; the UK has routes from temporary leave to ILR. The common feature: an initial right to live and work does not equal final, stable permanent status. To be clear, permanent residence already granted in Europe is legally protected; the comparison concerns uncertainty on the path to it.
🔄 美国正在出现的类似过程：先提交移民申请等排期 → 表B到了，提交I-485 → 取得EAD工卡和Advance Parole返美证 → 一两年甚至更久仍然Pending → 在美国工作、买房、结婚生子、孩子上学 → 移民局开始最终审查，要求新证据、质疑多年前的历史，或作出拒绝。一个看起来已在美国安家多年的人，最后仍可能拿不到绿卡，而且可能已失去原本可以独立维持的非移民身份。
A similar pattern emerging in the U.S.: File the petition and wait → Chart B becomes current, file the I-485 → obtain an EAD and Advance Parole → still pending after one, two, or more years → work, buy a home, marry, have children, enroll kids in school → USCIS begins final review, requests new evidence, questions old history, or denies. Someone who appears settled in the U.S. for years may still be denied, possibly after losing the nonimmigrant status they once could have maintained independently.
所以我们说，美国绿卡在某些方面正变得更像"不靠谱的欧洲永居"——不是已获得的美国永久居民身份变成了临时身份，而是取得永久身份之前的漫长等待，正在增加申请人的不确定性。
That is why we say the U.S. green card is, in some respects, becoming more like "unreliable European residence": not that granted U.S. permanent residence has become temporary, but that the long wait before it is adding uncertainty.
6. 最危险的情况是什么？
What Is the Most Dangerous Scenario?
最危险的是等了几年被拒，原来的退路也没有了。假设一位中国留学生毕业后在美国工作，雇主为他办理PERM和I-140。表B排到后，他提交I-485并取得EAD，为了换工作方便，不再维持原来的H-1B身份。之后几年，他换了雇主、搬家、买房、成家生子。某天移民局审查I-485时，发现此前签证记录存在问题，或要求解释过去的工作和组织背景，或认为某些重要信息未准确披露，于是发出RFE或NOID。如果无法提供充分证据和有说服力的法律解释，最终可能收到拒绝决定。这时他可能已没有独立有效的H-1B身份，基于I-485的工卡和返美证也会受影响，工作、家庭、房产和孩子教育都可能受到冲击。若考虑出境到使领馆办移民签证，还需重新评估不可入境性和非法居留问题；如已产生三年或十年入境限制，贸然离境可能更复杂。并非每一种拒绝理由都能通过I-601豁免解决。
The worst case is a denial after years of waiting, with no fallback left. Imagine a Chinese graduate working in the U.S. whose employer files PERM and an I-140. When Chart B is current, he files an I-485, gets an EAD, and stops maintaining H-1B status to change jobs more easily. Over the next few years he changes employers, moves, buys a home, marries, and has children. Then, at final review, USCIS finds a problem in his visa history, asks him to explain past employment or organizational background, or believes material information was not accurately disclosed, and issues an RFE or NOID. Without sufficient evidence and persuasive legal argument, a denial may follow. By then he may have no valid H-1B, his I-485-based EAD and Advance Parole are affected, and his job, family, home, and children's schooling are all at risk. Consular processing abroad would require reassessing inadmissibility and unlawful presence; if a three- or ten-year bar applies, departing could make things worse. Not every denial ground can be cured with an I-601 waiver.
这个例子不意味着所有I-485申请人都必须一直维持H-1B，也不意味着每个错误都必然导致拒绝，具体后果取决于申请类别、个人事实和相关规定。但它说明：办理绿卡不只是争取尽早递交I-485，更要确保多年后仍经得起最终审核。
This does not mean every I-485 applicant must keep H-1B status, or that every mistake leads to denial; outcomes depend on the category, facts, and law. But it shows that getting a green card is not only about filing the I-485 early; the filing must withstand final review years later.
7. 申请人应该怎么办？
What Should Applicants Do?
从第一天开始，就按照几年后最终审查的标准准备。新未名律所的五点建议如下：
Prepare from day one to the standard of final review years later. New Weiming Law Group recommends five steps:
| 建议 / Step | 要点 / Key Points |
|---|---|
| ① 尽早做整体规划 Plan early |
不要等排期到了才研究I-485。办理PERM、EB-1A、NIW、EB-5或亲属移民时，就应了解最后一步的资格要求、需要披露的历史，以及可能的背景审查或不可入境性问题；需要补证、法律说明或豁免的，越早越有利。 Don't wait for the priority date to study the I-485. While pursuing PERM, EB-1A, NIW, EB-5, or family cases, learn the final-stage requirements, what history must be disclosed, and potential vetting or inadmissibility issues; plan any evidence, legal explanation, or waiver early. |
| ② 表格真实、准确、完整、前后一致 Accurate, consistent forms |
填写I-485、DS-260及以往各类申请时不能想当然，不要直接复制旧表格。不要以为当时没被发现就不会追究；发现错误应及时与律师讨论依法更正或补充，不要隐瞒或在面试时临时解释。 Don't assume when completing the I-485, DS-260, or earlier forms, and don't copy old forms blindly. An error unnoticed at filing can surface later; if you find one, discuss lawful correction with counsel rather than concealing it or improvising at the interview. |
| ③ 及时准备背景说明和证据 Prepare statements and evidence |
Statement需与证据相符、回应法律问题、时间线和逻辑清楚；必要时补充工作证明、身份记录、学校文件、组织关系材料、家庭关系材料和宣誓声明。需要从中国取得的材料，提前着手。 A statement must match the evidence, address the legal issue, and present a clear timeline; add employment letters, status records, school documents, organizational records, family documents, and affidavits as needed. Start early on anything that must come from China. |
| ④ I-485等待期间持续合规 Stay compliant while pending |
换工作、身份变化、国际旅行、婚姻变化、长期离境、违法记录等都需评估影响。AC21换工作必须满足条件；Advance Parole不保证在任何情况下都能入境。评估是否有必要、是否能够维持独立的非移民身份，为不利结果保留合法选择。 Assess job changes, status changes, travel, marital changes, long absences, and any arrests. AC21 portability has conditions; Advance Parole does not guarantee reentry in every case. Evaluate whether to maintain independent nonimmigrant status to preserve lawful options. |
| ⑤ 收到RFE、NOID或拒绝通知及时行动 Act quickly on RFEs, NOIDs, denials |
回复时间有限，重复材料或缺乏针对性的解释可能解决不了问题。有的案件需要I-601豁免，有的需要新证据，有的需要从法律适用角度反驳；已被拒的，可评估Motion to Reopen、Motion to Reconsider或重新申请。并非所有拒绝都能翻盘，最有效的仍是从一开始减少可避免的风险。 Response windows are short, and repetitive or untargeted submissions may not resolve the issue. Some cases need an I-601 waiver, others new evidence or legal rebuttal; after a denial, evaluate a Motion to Reopen, Motion to Reconsider, or refiling. Not every denial can be reversed, so the best strategy is reducing avoidable risk from the start. |
8. 新未名律所可以提供哪些帮助？
How Can New Weiming Law Group Help?
新未名律所多年来帮助大量中国申请人办理职业移民、亲属移民、投资移民及I-485和移民签证申请，客户包括通过PERM办理绿卡的专业人士，自主申请EB-1A和NIW的科研人员、工程师及其他专业人士，以及亲属移民和投资移民申请人。我们也有处理复杂背景、绿卡面试、RFE、NOID、I-601豁免，以及被拒后重新开案和上诉的实务经验。我们不只帮助你递交申请，更重视最终批准。
New Weiming Law Group has helped many Chinese applicants with employment-based, family-based, and investor immigration, I-485s, and immigrant visas, including PERM-sponsored professionals, self-petitioning EB-1A and NIW researchers and engineers, and family and investor applicants. We also handle complex backgrounds, green card interviews, RFEs, NOIDs, I-601 waivers, and post-denial motions and appeals. We focus not only on filing, but on final approval.
- 评估EB-1A、NIW、PERM、EB-5和亲属移民路径，分析排期及身份规划
Evaluate EB-1A, NIW, PERM, EB-5, and family pathways, including Visa Bulletin and status planning - 准备、审核I-485、移民签证及相关表格，检查是否准确、完整、一致
Prepare and review I-485, immigrant visa, and related forms for accuracy, completeness, and consistency - 识别可能影响最终批准的历史背景、签证身份和不可入境性问题
Identify background, status, and inadmissibility issues that could affect final approval - 准备Statement、法律说明和支持证据
Prepare statements, legal explanations, and supporting evidence - 评估I-485等待期间换工作、保持身份和国际旅行的法律风险
Assess risks of job changes, status maintenance, and travel while the I-485 is pending - 协助准备绿卡面试、模拟面试，回复RFE、NOID
Prepare for interviews, conduct mock interviews, and respond to RFEs and NOIDs - 对复杂案件评估I-601豁免、Motion to Reopen、Motion to Reconsider及其他救济方式
Evaluate I-601 waivers, motions to reopen or reconsider, and other remedies for complex cases
如果你已提交I-485，正在等待表A排期，或已经Pending一两年甚至更久，尤其是期间发生了换工作、身份变动、婚姻变化，或发现过去提交的材料有误，可以考虑请专业律师重新检查申请材料和身份历史，及时发现潜在风险。
If your I-485 is already pending, you are waiting for Chart A, or your case has been pending for a year or more, especially if you changed jobs, status, or marital situation, or found errors in past filings, consider having an attorney re-review your materials and status history to catch risks early.
9. 排期加快后，申请人最应避免什么？
With Faster Dates, What Should Applicants Avoid Most?
最需要避免的，是把全部精力花在争取提前递交申请上，却忽视了几年后可能决定成败的细节。过去很多人最担心排期太慢；现在排期加快了，但即使能提前提交I-485，最终批准也不一定容易。排期快是机会，能批准才是结果。绿卡排期可以等，某些错误却不能等到几年后才发现。与其等到被拒、身份失去保障后再花大量时间和金钱补救，不如从一开始就依法合规、及时披露重要事实、保留充分证据，并对未来几年的身份变化做好规划。
The biggest mistake is spending all your effort on filing early while neglecting details that may decide the outcome years later. Many people once worried mainly about slow dates; now dates move faster, but early filing does not make final approval easy. Faster dates are an opportunity; approval is the result. You can wait for the Visa Bulletin, but some errors cannot wait years to be discovered. Rather than paying heavily to fix a denial after losing status, comply from the start, disclose material facts, keep strong evidence, and plan for status changes in the years ahead.
💡 不要只追求早交I-485，更要争取最终顺利拿到绿卡。机会青睐有准备的人。
Don't just aim to file the I-485 early; aim to actually get the green card. Opportunity favors the prepared.
无论您正在办理EB-1A、NIW国家利益豁免、PERM、EB-5、亲属移民，还是I-140/I-485已Pending多年，新未名律所的靠谱华人移民律师团队都可以帮助您分析问题、准备材料、规划身份，并处理RFE、NOID、I-601豁免和被拒后的救济。欢迎联系我们获取免费评估（Free Evaluation）。新未名律所在美国首都华盛顿地区、大华府DMV地区、马里兰(Maryland)和弗吉尼亚(Virginia)为华人、留学生、博士后及高科技/科研人员提供全方位移民法律服务。
Whether you are pursuing EB-1A, NIW, PERM, EB-5, or family-based immigration, or your I-140/I-485 has been pending for years, New Weiming Law Group's experienced, reliable immigration attorneys can help you analyze issues, prepare documents, plan your status, and handle RFEs, NOIDs, I-601 waivers, and post-denial remedies. Contact us for a Free Evaluation. New Weiming Law Group serves the Washington D.C. metropolitan area, the DMV region, Maryland, and Virginia, providing comprehensive immigration legal services for Chinese nationals, international students, postdocs, and STEM professionals.
联系律师 / Contact Our Attorneys
蔡律师 / Attorney Cai：mcai@nwmlaw.com
杨律师 / Attorney Yang：qian.yang@nwmlaw.com
张律师 / Attorney Zhang：yuanyuan.zhang@nwmlaw.com
YouTube：@NewWeimingLaw
微信视频号、小红书、抖音搜索 / WeChat Channels, Xiaohongshu, Douyin：玫花露美国移民留学
关于新未名律所 / About New Weiming Law Group
新未名律所（New Weiming Law Group）成立于2009年，立足美国首都华盛顿地区，服务大华府DMV地区、马里兰(Maryland)和弗吉尼亚(Virginia)及全美的华人、留学生、博士后及高科技/科研人员。
Founded in 2009, New Weiming Law Group is based in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and serves Chinese nationals, international students, postdocs, and STEM professionals in the DMV region, Maryland, Virginia, and nationwide.
律所精英合伙人团队均拥有美国顶级法学院法学博士（J.D.）学位，及名校理工科博士（Ph.D.）学位和多年科研经验。结合体系内美国移民律师协会（AILA）成员的专业视野与超过17年的风控博弈及一线护航经历，提供免费评估 Free Evaluation。
Our partners hold J.D. degrees from leading U.S. law schools as well as Ph.D. degrees in STEM fields from top universities, with years of research experience. Combining the professional perspective of AILA members with more than 17 years of front-line risk management and case advocacy, we provide a Free Evaluation.
官网 / Website：www.nwmlaw.com
邮箱 / Email：info@nwmlaw.com
关于"新未名"名称及机构关系的澄清说明
美国新未名律师事务所（New Weiming Law Group, PLLC）系在美国依法设立并执业的律师事务所，从2009年创立至今，已经帮助上万申请人取得了美国绿卡、签证和各类移民申请批准。本所在中国大陆没有设立任何分所、分支机构、办事处、代表处或其他经营机构。
对于在中国境内注册或者经营、名称中含有"新未名"字样的出国服务、移民服务、留学服务、中介、咨询或其他机构，本所特此说明：这些机构不是美国新未名律师事务所的中国分所、分支机构或办事处，与本所不存在隶属、控股、加盟、合伙、共同经营或授权代理关系。
如有任何个人或机构声称其为美国新未名律师事务所在中国的分所、办公室、代表处、独家代理或授权机构，请直接发信向美国新未名律师事务所核实。
核实邮箱 / Verification Email：info@nwmlaw.com
美国新未名律师事务所
New Weiming Law Group, PLLC
Clarification Regarding the "New Weiming" Name and Institutional Relationships (English Translation)
New Weiming Law Group, PLLC is a law firm lawfully established and practicing in the United States. Since its founding in 2009, it has helped tens of thousands of applicants obtain approvals for U.S. green cards, visas, and other immigration applications. The firm has not established any branch office, subsidiary, office, representative office, or other business establishment in mainland China.
With respect to overseas services, immigration services, study-abroad services, agencies, consultancies, or other organizations registered or operating in China whose names contain the words "新未名" (New Weiming), the firm hereby states: these organizations are not branches, subsidiaries, or offices of New Weiming Law Group in China, and have no affiliation, controlling interest, franchise, partnership, joint operation, or authorized agency relationship with the firm.
If any individual or organization claims to be a branch, office, representative office, exclusive agent, or authorized entity of New Weiming Law Group in China, please verify directly with New Weiming Law Group by email.
New Weiming Law Group, PLLC
免责声明：本文仅供一般移民法律信息和政策趋势分析，不构成针对个人具体情况的法律意见。排期预测具有不确定性，既往案例不保证未来申请取得相同结果。文中举例为假设情形，具体法律后果取决于申请类别、个人事实及适用法律。不同国家的永久居留制度和美国绿卡制度存在重要法律区别。请咨询合格的美国移民律师。
Disclaimer: This article provides general immigration law information and policy trend analysis only and does not constitute legal advice for any individual situation. Visa Bulletin predictions are uncertain, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Examples are hypothetical; actual consequences depend on the category, individual facts, and applicable law. Permanent residence systems in other countries differ in important legal ways from the U.S. green card system. Consult a qualified U.S. immigration attorney.
