被ICE扣留以后怎样申请Bond？INA §236(a) Bond Hearing与缴纳保释金全流程 How to Get a Bond After ICE Detention: The Complete INA §236(a) Bond Hearing and Bond Payment Process
一句话核心总结（TL;DR）：对于合法入境后身份过期、延期/转换身份或I-485被拒后被ICE拘留、且不属于§236(c)、§235(b)或§241的INA §236(a)案件，最重要的一点是："申请bond hearing"和"交bond钱"是两个不同步骤——前者向Immigration Court请求法官重新决定custody，后者是向ICE ERO Bond Acceptance Office实际缴纳保证金。如果ICE已设一个家庭负担得起的bond，直接交钱往往最快；如果是No Bond或金额过高，可提交Request for Bond Redetermination，无需等NTA提交法院、没有filing fee，且必须交给detention facility所在地有管辖权的Immigration Court（BIA 2026年Matter of Vizcaino Aybar再次强调）。法官主要看danger、flight risk、national security三个问题。Bond release不等于案件结束，removal proceedings继续进行。
TL;DR (English): For INA §236(a) cases — lawful entry, then status expired or an extension, change of status, or I-485 was denied, followed by ICE detention, without falling under §236(c), §235(b), or §241 — the key point is that "requesting a bond hearing" and "paying the bond" are two different steps. The first asks the Immigration Court to redetermine custody; the second is actually paying the bond to an ICE ERO Bond Acceptance Office. If ICE has already set an affordable bond, paying it is often fastest. If ICE set No Bond or a high amount, file a Request for Bond Redetermination — no need to wait for the NTA to be filed, and no filing fee — with the Immigration Court having jurisdiction over the place of detention (reaffirmed by the BIA in Matter of Vizcaino Aybar, 2026). The judge focuses on danger, flight risk, and national security. Release on bond does not end the case; removal proceedings continue.
新未名律所立足美国首都华盛顿地区，服务大华府DMV地区、马里兰(Maryland)、弗吉尼亚(Virginia)及全美的华人、留学生、博士后及高科技/科研人员。许多当事人曾持B-2、F-1、J-1、H-1B、L-1或O-1合法入境，后因身份过期或I-485被拒而被ICE拘留。作为靠谱华人移民律师团队，我们按实际办案顺序梳理§236(a) bond的完整流程和常见错误。
New Weiming Law Group is based in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and serves Chinese nationals, international students, postdocs, and STEM professionals in the DMV region, Maryland, Virginia, and nationwide. Many of our clients entered lawfully on B-2, F-1, J-1, H-1B, L-1, or O-1 status and were later detained by ICE after their status expired or an I-485 was denied. As experienced, reliable immigration attorneys, we walk through the full §236(a) bond process and common mistakes in the order a case actually unfolds.
🗺️ 最简化流程图 / Simplified Flowchart
- ICE arrest / detention
- → 确认§236(a) / Confirm §236(a)
- → G-28给ICE + 找Deportation Officer / File G-28 with ICE, reach the Deportation Officer
- → 确认detention facility + ICE custody determination / Confirm facility and ICE custody decision
- → ICE bond可接受：直接向ICE ERO缴bond / If ICE bond is acceptable: pay at ICE ERO
- → No Bond或太高：EOIR-28 + Request for Bond Redetermination + Bond Packet，提交给detention location所属Immigration Court / If No Bond or too high: EOIR-28 + request + packet to the court covering the detention location
- → Bond Hearing → IJ release / sets bond
- → 家属或obligor向ICE ERO Bond Acceptance Office缴钱 / Family or obligor pays at the ICE ERO Bond Acceptance Office
- → ICE processing → released → removal proceedings继续 / Removal proceedings continue
1. 被ICE拘留以后，律师最先要确定什么？
After an ICE Detention, What Must Counsel Establish First?
第一步不是立即把一大包材料交给法院，而是先确定四件事：人关在哪里；A-number；ICE的custody determination是什么（No Bond、Release on Recognizance，还是例如$5,000 / $10,000 / $20,000 bond）；以及该detention facility对应哪个Immigration Court。
The first step is not to file a stack of documents with the court, but to establish four things: where the person is held; the A-number; ICE's custody determination (No Bond, Release on Recognizance, or a bond such as $5,000 / $10,000 / $20,000); and which Immigration Court covers that facility.
| 表格 / Form | 提交对象 / Filed With | 作用 / Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Form G-28 | ICE ERO（通过ERO eFile） | 在案后律师才能较顺利向Deportation Officer/ERO获取custody、bond、release信息 Lets counsel obtain custody, bond, and release information from the Deportation Officer/ERO |
| Form EOIR-28 | Immigration Court | 可限定为"custody and bond proceedings only"，不一定代理整个removal merits case Can be limited to "custody and bond proceedings only," without covering the full removal merits case |
2. 如果ICE已经给了一个可以接受的bond金额，怎么办？
What If ICE Has Already Set an Acceptable Bond Amount?
例如ICE决定"Custody determination: $10,000 bond"，如果家属认为可以接受，不需要再去Immigration Judge申请一次，可直接安排缴纳。ICE规定，detained alien的immigration bond可在全国的ERO Bond Acceptance Offices缴纳，通常周一至周五（联邦假日除外）当地时间上午9:00至下午3:00。
If ICE sets, for example, a $10,000 bond and the family finds it acceptable, there's no need to go to an Immigration Judge — arrange payment directly. Per ICE, bonds for detained aliens can be posted at ERO Bond Acceptance Offices nationwide, generally Monday–Friday (excluding federal holidays), 9:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m. local time.
⚠️ 钱不是交给Immigration Court或EOIR，而是交给ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations（ERO）。法官只是sets / redetermines the bond；真正accepts the bond payment and releases the detainee的是ICE。
The money is not paid to the Immigration Court or EOIR — it goes to ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO). The judge only sets or redetermines the bond; ICE accepts payment and releases the detainee.
3. 如果ICE给No Bond或金额太高，可以怎么做？
What Can Be Done If ICE Sets No Bond or Too High a Bond?
此时§236(a) detainee可以向Immigration Judge请求Bond Redetermination Hearing，这是独立于removal proceeding的custody proceeding，EOIR规则明确规定IJ可以重新决定DHS/ICE设置的bond。即使DHS还没有把NTA正式filed with Immigration Court，IJ也可以有bond jurisdiction，因此不应因为ECAS/EOIR系统暂时查不到removal case就等待。
A §236(a) detainee can then request a Bond Redetermination Hearing before an Immigration Judge — a custody proceeding separate from removal proceedings. EOIR rules expressly allow the IJ to redetermine a DHS/ICE bond. Even before DHS files the NTA with the court, the IJ may have bond jurisdiction, so don't wait just because ECAS/EOIR doesn't yet show a removal case.
4. Bond Request应该交给哪个Immigration Court？
Which Immigration Court Should Receive the Bond Request?
原则是：detention facility所在地具有管辖权的Immigration Court，而不一定是原住址所在地法院、I-485所在州、ICE arrest所在州、NTA上将来的court或律师所在州。EOIR Practice Manual如此规定；BIA在Matter of Vizcaino Aybar, 29 I&N Dec. 736 (BIA 2026)中又依据8 C.F.R. §1003.19(c)(1)明确，bond redetermination的proper venue是"Immigration Court having jurisdiction over the respondent's place of detention"。
The rule: the Immigration Court with jurisdiction over the place of detention — not necessarily the court near the person's home, the I-485 state, the arrest state, the future court on the NTA, or the attorney's state. The EOIR Practice Manual says so, and the BIA in Matter of Vizcaino Aybar, 29 I&N Dec. 736 (BIA 2026), citing 8 C.F.R. §1003.19(c)(1), reaffirmed that the proper venue is the "Immigration Court having jurisdiction over the respondent's place of detention."
📍 示例：客户在弗吉尼亚(Virginia)被arrest，两天后被transfer到Louisiana detention center。此时不要机械地向Annandale Immigration Court提bond，应查该Louisiana facility由哪个detained immigration court管辖。遇到transfer必须马上重新确认。
Example: A client is arrested in Virginia and transferred two days later to a Louisiana detention center. Don't automatically file with the Annandale Immigration Court; determine which detained court covers that Louisiana facility. Re-check immediately after any transfer.
5. 怎样正式启动Bond Hearing？需要什么表格和费用？
How Is a Bond Hearing Formally Started? What Forms and Fees Apply?
没有类似"I-485"的专门EOIR bond表格。律师通常提交Request (or Motion) for Bond Redetermination。EOIR明确说不需要formal motion，某些情况下detainee甚至可以oral request，但律师代理时建议书面提出。Bond request本身没有filing fee。
There is no dedicated EOIR bond form like an I-485. Counsel usually files a Request (or Motion) for Bond Redetermination. EOIR says no formal motion is required, and a detainee may sometimes request orally, but a written request is recommended when represented. There is no filing fee for a bond request.
📄 Request的最低内容 / Minimum Contents of the Request
- Respondent full name 与 A-number
- Detention facility（拘留地点）
- DHS/ICE current bond amount；如为No Bond，写明DHS has declined to set bond
- 请求IJ schedule bond hearing
Request that the IJ schedule a bond hearing - 如有NTA，附Form I-862
Attach Form I-862 if available - Counsel information 与 EOIR-28
6. 只交一页纸的bare request够吗？完整Bond Packet怎么组织？
Is a One-Page Bare Request Enough? How Should a Full Bond Packet Be Organized?
理论上可以先交一页纸（"Respondent respectfully requests a bond redetermination hearing pursuant to INA §236(a) and 8 C.F.R. §1003.19."）先抢hearing date。但材料准备得出来时，更倾向于提交完整的Bond Redetermination Packet。Tab A通常为程序文件：Cover page（BOND PROCEEDINGS）、EOIR-28、Request for Bond Redetermination、Form I-862 NTA（如有）、Form I-286 / ICE custody determination（如取得）、facility信息。
In theory, a one-page request can be filed first to secure a hearing date. But when materials are available, a complete Bond Redetermination Packet is preferable. Tab A usually holds procedural documents: a "BOND PROCEEDINGS" cover page, EOIR-28, the Request for Bond Redetermination, Form I-862 NTA (if any), Form I-286 / ICE custody determination (if obtained), and facility information.
⚠️ Bond record和removal case record是两个独立的Record of Proceedings。即使某文件已在removal proceeding里交过，想让bond judge看，也应重新提交到bond record。
The bond record and the removal record are separate Records of Proceedings. Even if a document was filed in the removal case, it must be filed again in the bond record for the bond judge to consider it.
7. 移民法官决定Bond时主要看什么？
What Does the Immigration Judge Focus On When Deciding Bond?
EOIR Practice Manual列明三个因素：Danger、Flight risk、National security。对于合法入境（B-2/F-1/H-1B等）后身份过期、extension或I-485被拒、无刑事记录的典型案件，争议通常集中在Flight Risk。因此bond packet的核心不是反复解释I-485为什么被拒，而是证明：这个人有充分理由留在美国依法处理案件，并会按时出庭。
The EOIR Practice Manual lists three factors: danger, flight risk, and national security. In the typical case — lawful entry (B-2, F-1, H-1B, etc.), then expired status or a denied extension or I-485, with no criminal record — the dispute usually centers on flight risk. So the packet's core is not re-arguing the I-485 denial, but showing the person has strong reasons to stay and pursue the case lawfully and will appear at every hearing.
8. 证明没有Flight Risk，最好准备哪些材料？
What Evidence Best Shows the Respondent Is Not a Flight Risk?
| 类别 / Category | 材料 / Evidence |
|---|---|
| 身份/移民历史 Immigration history |
Passport、I-94、prior I-797 approvals、extension/change-of-status receipts、I-485 receipt与denial、EAD/AP记录。合法入境、长期遵守身份的历史可用来说明history of compliance，而不是把"现在无身份"当作全部故事。 Passport, I-94, prior I-797s, receipts, I-485 receipt and denial, EAD/AP records. A history of lawful entry and compliance shows respect for immigration law rather than letting current lack of status define the story. |
| 家庭关系 Family ties |
USC/LPR配偶、USC子女、父母兄弟姐妹；结婚证、出生证、配偶护照/入籍证/绿卡、子女学校记录 USC/LPR spouse, USC children, parents, siblings; marriage and birth certificates, spouse's status proof, school records |
| 固定住所 Fixed residence |
lease、deed、mortgage、utility bills、driver's license/state ID、寄给本人的信件；明确写出"Upon release, Respondent will reside at ______." Lease, deed, mortgage, utilities, ID, mail; state the exact release address |
| 工作及经济联系 Employment and financial ties |
合法工作历史的employment verification、W-2、tax returns、paystubs、employer letter Employment verification, W-2s, tax returns, paystubs, employer letter for lawful employment history |
⚠️ 如果现在已经没有work authorization，不要写"He will immediately return to work."应谨慎写成例如"His family is prepared to financially support him during the pendency of proceedings."，避免bond packet自己制造unauthorized employment admission。
If there is no current work authorization, don't write "He will immediately return to work." Instead write something like "His family is prepared to financially support him during the pendency of proceedings," so the packet doesn't create an admission of unauthorized employment.
9. 潜在的移民救济途径对Bond有帮助吗？
Does Potential Immigration Relief Help the Bond Case?
有帮助。例如approved或pending I-130、adjustment eligibility、waiver eligibility、cancellation、asylum、withholding、VAWA/U/T visa、pending appeal/motion。一个人如果有potentially viable defense或relief from removal，通常更容易解释为什么他会留下来继续出庭。但bond hearing不是merits hearing，不必在此完整litigate I-485 eligibility，只需一个强而简洁的prima facie showing。
Yes. Examples include an approved or pending I-130, adjustment eligibility, waiver eligibility, cancellation, asylum, withholding, VAWA/U/T visas, or a pending appeal or motion. Someone with a potentially viable defense or relief from removal can more easily explain why they will stay and keep appearing. But a bond hearing is not a merits hearing — a strong, concise prima facie showing is enough, without fully litigating I-485 eligibility.
10. Danger部分怎样准备？有arrest记录怎么办？
How Is the "Danger" Issue Addressed, Especially With a Prior Arrest?
完全无犯罪记录时，可提交FBI/state background records、视情况提交local police clearance、无arrest/conviction的declaration及good character letters。如有arrest，千万不要简单写"No criminal convictions therefore no danger."，因为IJ在bond context中看得比statutory conviction定义更宽。应取得charging document、disposition、plea documents、sentencing、probation completion、police report（是否提交需单独评估）和rehabilitation evidence，针对具体事件解释。OPLA很可能有自己的records。
With no criminal history, submit FBI/state background records, local police clearance where appropriate, a declaration of no arrests or convictions, and good-character letters. If there was an arrest, never simply argue "No criminal convictions, therefore no danger," because IJs look more broadly in the bond context. Obtain the charging document, disposition, plea and sentencing records, proof of probation completion, the police report (whether to submit it requires separate judgment), and rehabilitation evidence, and address the specific incident. OPLA likely has its own records.
11. Sponsor / Family Declaration应该写什么？
What Should a Sponsor or Family Declaration Say?
例如由USC配偶说明：本人是美国公民；Respondent获释后将与本人同住于某地址；本人负责其住房和经济支持；会确保其参加所有ICE check-in及immigration court hearing；家庭成员和在当地居住年限等。同时附上sponsor ID、身份证明、地址证明及employment/tax证据。这类declaration对flight-risk分析很有帮助。
For example, a USC spouse states: I am a U.S. citizen; upon release the Respondent will live with me at a specific address; I will provide housing and financial support; I will ensure attendance at every ICE check-in and court hearing; plus family details and years of local residence. Attach the sponsor's ID, status proof, address evidence, and employment/tax records. Such declarations meaningfully support the flight-risk analysis.
12. Bond Hearing当天律师怎样argue？
How Does Counsel Argue at the Bond Hearing?
EOIR明确说bond proceedings通常更informal，一般没有完整录音或transcript。律师向法官作offer of proof / proffer，说明respondent does not pose a danger, is not a flight risk, and is not a national security threat，然后回应ICE/OPLA的反对理由。
EOIR notes bond proceedings are usually more informal and generally not fully recorded or transcribed. Counsel makes an offer of proof / proffer that the respondent poses no danger, flight risk, or national security threat, then responds to ICE/OPLA's objections.
🎙️ 典型Argument示例 / Sample Argument
"Respondent entered the United States lawfully in B-2 status in 2018. He has no criminal history. He has continuously resided with his U.S.-citizen spouse and two U.S.-citizen children at the proposed release address. He has an approved I-130 and intends to pursue relief in removal proceedings. His family is prepared to provide housing and financial support. He therefore presents neither a danger nor a flight risk, and respectfully requests release on recognizance or, alternatively, a reasonable bond."
13. 应该要求多少Bond比较合适？
How Much Bond Should You Ask For?
INA §236(a)的statutory minimum是$1,500，但实际设定金额可能明显更高。策略上不要只说"Please reduce the bond."，而应明确提出：Release on recognizance, or alternatively a bond in the amount of $1,500 / $3,000 / $5,000。具体数字取决于immigration history、prior failures to appear、family ties、criminal history、relief strength、length of residence和prior immigration violations。
The statutory minimum under INA §236(a) is $1,500, though actual amounts are often much higher. Rather than just "please reduce the bond," make a specific request: release on recognizance, or alternatively a bond of $1,500 / $3,000 / $5,000. The figure depends on immigration history, prior failures to appear, family ties, criminal history, strength of relief, length of residence, and prior violations.
💡 不要请求一个客户实际上交不起的bond，然后法官真的设成那个数。提前问家属：今天设$5,000能否马上交？$10,000呢？$15,000呢？律师在hearing才知道底线。
Don't ask for a bond the client can't actually pay, only to have the judge set exactly that. Ask the family in advance: could you pay $5,000 today? $10,000? $15,000? Then counsel knows the bottom line at the hearing.
14. 法官批准以后，钱怎么交？谁可以做Obligor？
After the Judge Rules, How Is Bond Paid, and Who Can Be the Obligor?
例如IJ order "Bond set at $5,000."，家属或obligor不是给法院钱，而是到ICE ERO Bond Acceptance Office办理（通常周一至周五当地时间9:00–15:00）。这种§236 release通常是Delivery Bond，核心文件是Form I-352, Immigration Bond：obligor对respondent按ICE要求出现/交付承担责任；违反bond条件，ICE可以declare bond breached。
If the IJ orders "Bond set at $5,000," the family or obligor pays not the court but an ICE ERO Bond Acceptance Office (generally weekdays, 9:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m. local time). A §236 release is usually a Delivery Bond using Form I-352, Immigration Bond: the obligor is responsible for producing the respondent when ICE requires, and ICE can declare the bond breached if conditions are violated.
| 角色 / Role | 说明 / Description |
|---|---|
| Respondent / Principal | 被release的外国人 The noncitizen being released |
| Obligor | 向政府承担bond义务并提供资金的人，可以是配偶、亲属、朋友、其他个人/实体或qualified surety company，不一定由被拘留人本人出钱 The person who assumes the bond obligation and funds it — spouse, relative, friend, other person/entity, or a qualified surety company; need not be the detainee |
办理前最好向具体ERO bond office确认目前接受的payment method、identification、taxpayer identification information及appointment/walk-in procedure。I-352要求cash bond obligor提供taxpayer identification information，用于利息和申报。
Before going, confirm with the specific ERO bond office its accepted payment methods, ID requirements, taxpayer identification requirements, and appointment or walk-in procedures. Form I-352 requires a cash bond obligor to provide taxpayer identification information for interest and reporting purposes.
15. Bond交完，案件就结束了吗？
Does Posting Bond End the Case?
不是。Bond release只是release from physical ICE custody，不是I-485 approved，不是NTA dismissed，更不是lawful status restored。Removal proceeding继续，respondent仍须：出席每一次Immigration Court hearing；遵守ICE/ERO reporting和bond条件；更新地址，搬家时同时处理EOIR和ICE的地址义务。如果ICE向obligor发出Demand to Produce Alien而respondent不出现，ICE可以declare delivery bond breached。因此obligor是案件中的重要角色，不只是"替客户付钱的人"。
No. Release on bond only ends physical ICE custody — it does not approve the I-485, dismiss the NTA, or restore lawful status. Removal proceedings continue, and the respondent must attend every court hearing, comply with ICE/ERO reporting and bond conditions, and update the address with both EOIR and ICE when moving. If ICE issues a Demand to Produce Alien to the obligor and the respondent fails to appear, ICE can declare the delivery bond breached. The obligor is therefore an important participant, not just "the person who paid."
16. Bond Hearing最容易犯哪些错误？
What Are the Most Common Bond Hearing Mistakes?
- 向错误的Immigration Court file：Matter of Vizcaino Aybar之后尤其要看actual place of detention。
Filing with the wrong court — after Vizcaino Aybar, look to the actual place of detention. - 等NTA filed才申请bond：符合管辖时没必要等。
Waiting for the NTA to be filed — unnecessary where jurisdiction exists. - 把removal packet当作bond packet：bond有独立ROP，证据需重新提交。
Treating the removal packet as the bond packet — bond has a separate record. - 只讲immigration relief，不讲release plan：bond直接问题是danger/flight risk，不是I-485 merits。
Arguing relief without a release plan — the issue is danger and flight risk, not I-485 merits. - 在declaration中无意承认unauthorized employment、fraud、misrepresentation等事实：bond证据以后可能成为政府案件的一部分，每句事实陈述都应从merits角度审核。
Inadvertently admitting unauthorized work, fraud, or misrepresentation — bond evidence may later be used by the government. - 有刑事记录却只提交有利的disposition：先拿完整criminal record，OPLA很可能有自己的记录。
Submitting only favorable dispositions — obtain the full record; OPLA likely has its own. - 没有提前准备交bond的人和资金：赢了才找obligor，会白白延长detention。
Not lining up the obligor and funds in advance — this needlessly prolongs detention. - 把ICE bond和IJ bond搞混：ICE已设家庭负担得起的金额时，直接交钱往往比为降几千美元再等IJ hearing更实际。
Confusing ICE bond with IJ bond — if ICE's amount is affordable, paying it is often more practical than waiting for a hearing to save a few thousand dollars.
新未名律所的靠谱华人移民律师团队办理ICE拘留案件的G-28/EOIR-28代理、Bond Redetermination Request与Bond Packet准备、bond hearing出庭、obligor与缴费指导，以及I-485被拒后的救济评估、RFE/NOID回复、EB-1A、NIW国家利益豁免、EB-2/3 PERM、I-140/I-485、H-1B、L-1、O-1、F-1身份维护、J-1豁免和双重意图（Dual Intent）规划。如家人已被ICE拘留，请尽快联系我们获取免费评估（Free Evaluation）。新未名律所在美国首都华盛顿地区、大华府DMV地区、马里兰(Maryland)和弗吉尼亚(Virginia)为华人、留学生、博士后及高科技/科研人员提供全方位移民法律服务。
New Weiming Law Group's experienced immigration attorneys handle G-28/EOIR-28 representation in ICE detention cases, bond redetermination requests and packets, bond hearing appearances, obligor and payment guidance, plus relief evaluation after I-485 denials, RFE/NOID responses, EB-1A, NIW, EB-2/3 PERM, I-140/I-485, H-1B, L-1, O-1, F-1 status maintenance, J-1 waivers, and Dual Intent planning. If a family member has been detained by ICE, contact us promptly for a Free Evaluation. New Weiming Law Group serves the Washington D.C. metropolitan area, the DMV region, Maryland, and Virginia, providing comprehensive immigration legal services for Chinese nationals, international students, postdocs, and STEM professionals.
关于新未名律所 / About New Weiming Law Group
新未名律所（New Weiming Law Group）成立于2009年，立足美国首都华盛顿地区，服务大华府DMV地区、马里兰(Maryland)和弗吉尼亚(Virginia)及全美的华人、留学生、博士后及高科技/科研人员。
Founded in 2009, New Weiming Law Group is based in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and serves Chinese nationals, international students, postdocs, and STEM professionals in the DMV region, Maryland, Virginia, and nationwide.
律所精英合伙人团队均拥有美国顶级法学院法学博士（J.D.）学位，及名校理工科博士（Ph.D.）学位和多年科研经验。结合体系内美国移民律师协会（AILA）成员的专业视野与超过17年的风控博弈及一线护航经历，提供免费评估 Free Evaluation。
Our partners hold J.D. degrees from leading U.S. law schools as well as Ph.D. degrees in STEM fields from top universities, with years of research experience. Combining the professional perspective of AILA members with more than 17 years of front-line risk management and case advocacy, we provide a Free Evaluation.
官网 / Website：www.nwmlaw.com
邮箱 / Email：info@nwmlaw.com
关于"新未名"名称及机构关系的澄清说明
美国新未名律师事务所（New Weiming Law Group, PLLC）系在美国依法设立并执业的律师事务所，从2009年创立至今，已经帮助上万申请人取得了美国绿卡、签证和各类移民申请批准。本所在中国大陆没有设立任何分所、分支机构、办事处、代表处或其他经营机构。
对于在中国境内注册或者经营、名称中含有"新未名"字样的出国服务、移民服务、留学服务、中介、咨询或其他机构，本所特此说明：这些机构不是美国新未名律师事务所的中国分所、分支机构或办事处，与本所不存在隶属、控股、加盟、合伙、共同经营或授权代理关系。
如有任何个人或机构声称其为美国新未名律师事务所在中国的分所、办公室、代表处、独家代理或授权机构，请直接发信向美国新未名律师事务所核实。
核实邮箱 / Verification Email：info@nwmlaw.com
美国新未名律师事务所
New Weiming Law Group, PLLC
Clarification Regarding the "New Weiming" Name and Institutional Relationships (English Translation)
New Weiming Law Group, PLLC is a law firm lawfully established and practicing in the United States. Since its founding in 2009, it has helped tens of thousands of applicants obtain approvals for U.S. green cards, visas, and other immigration applications. The firm has not established any branch office, subsidiary, office, representative office, or other business establishment in mainland China.
With respect to overseas services, immigration services, study-abroad services, agencies, consultancies, or other organizations registered or operating in China whose names contain the words "新未名" (New Weiming), the firm hereby states: these organizations are not branches, subsidiaries, or offices of New Weiming Law Group in China, and have no affiliation, controlling interest, franchise, partnership, joint operation, or authorized agency relationship with the firm.
If any individual or organization claims to be a branch, office, representative office, exclusive agent, or authorized entity of New Weiming Law Group in China, please verify directly with New Weiming Law Group by email.
New Weiming Law Group, PLLC
免责声明：本文仅为一般性法律信息介绍，不针对任何个人案件构成法律意见，也不构成对bond、释放或案件结果的保证。本文讨论以INA §236(a)为前提；§236(c)、§235(b)、§241等其他拘留依据适用完全不同的规则。管辖法院、bond金额、缴费方式和办公时间可能因地点和政策变化而不同，引用的判例和法规以最新官方版本为准。Bond声明中的事实陈述可能影响后续removal案件，提交前应由律师审核。请咨询合格的美国移民律师。
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information only. It does not constitute legal advice for any specific case and does not guarantee any bond, release, or case outcome. The discussion assumes INA §236(a) applies; other detention authorities such as §236(c), §235(b), and §241 follow entirely different rules. Court jurisdiction, bond amounts, payment methods, and office hours may vary by location and policy changes; rely on the latest official versions of cited decisions and regulations. Factual statements in bond declarations can affect later removal proceedings and should be reviewed by counsel before filing. Consult a qualified U.S. immigration attorney.
